Coco vs The Prince and the Pauper

Coco has the higher audience score (8.2/10 against 6.2/10 for The Prince and the Pauper). The Prince and the Pauper is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 45m. The Prince and the Pauper is the older of the two (2000 against 2017). Both are adventure, family movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Coco posterCoco2017 VS The Prince and the Pauper posterThe Prince and the Pauper2000
CocoThe Prince and the Pauper
Audience score★ 8.2/10★ 6.2/10
Year20172000
Length1h 45m1h 30m
GenresAdventure, Animation, Family, MusicAdventure, Family
CountryUnited States of America–
DirectorLee UnkrichGiles Foster
Main castEdward James Olmos, Natalia Cordova-Buckley, Gael García Bernal, Benjamin Bratt, Lombardo BoyarPerdita Weeks, Jonathan Hyde, Aidan Quinn, Alan Bates, Jonathan Timmins

Synopsis

Coco

Despite his family’s baffling generations-old ban on music, Miguel dreams of becoming an accomplished musician like his idol, Ernesto de la Cruz. Desperate to prove his talent, Miguel finds himself in the stunning and colorful Land of the Dead following a mysterious chain of events. Along the way, he meets charming trickster Hector, and together, they set off on an extraordinary journey to unlock the real story behind Miguel's family history.

The Prince and the Pauper

An adaptation of the classic, "The Prince and the Pauper" is the retelling of Edward Tudor and young Thomas Canty, two amazing look-alikes caught up in imperial intrigue and scandal. In fleeing from his violent father, Tom stumbles into the palace courtyard, and is seen by young Prince Edward, who takes him in. Each desiring to see what the other's life is like, the boys impulsively switch identities... little knowing what disaster lies ahead…

Where to watch

Where to watch CocoWhere to watch The Prince and the Pauper

More like Coco · More like The Prince and the Pauper · Compare other titles