Collateral Damage vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for Collateral Damage). Collateral Damage is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 2h 26m. Collateral Damage is the older of the two (2002 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Collateral Damage
Man on Fire| Collateral Damage | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Andrew Davis | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Tyler Posey, John Turturro, Miguel Sandoval, John Leguizamo, Arnold Schwarzenegger | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Collateral Damage
Firefighter Gordon Brewer is plunged into the complex and dangerous world of international terrorism after he loses his wife and child in a bombing credited to Claudio 'The Wolf' Perrini.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Collateral DamageWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Collateral Damage · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles