Collateral Damage vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for Collateral Damage). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 48m. Collateral Damage is the older of the two (2002 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Collateral Damage
Undisputed III: Redemption| Collateral Damage | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Andrew Davis | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Tyler Posey, John Turturro, Miguel Sandoval, John Leguizamo, Arnold Schwarzenegger | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Collateral Damage
Firefighter Gordon Brewer is plunged into the complex and dangerous world of international terrorism after he loses his wife and child in a bombing credited to Claudio 'The Wolf' Perrini.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch Collateral DamageWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Collateral Damage · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles