Conquest 1453 vs King Arthur
King Arthur has the higher audience score (6.3/10 against 6/10 for Conquest 1453). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 40m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2012). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Conquest 1453
King Arthur| Conquest 1453 | King Arthur | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2004 |
| Length | 2h 40m | 2h 6m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Faruk Aksoy | Antoine Fuqua |
| Main cast | Devrim Evin, İbrahim Çelikkol, Dilek Serbest, Cengiz Coşkun, Recep Aktuğ | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy |
Synopsis
Conquest 1453
After the death of his father Murat II, Mehmet II ascends to the Ottoman throne. After braving internal and external enemies, he decides to complete what he was destined to do: Conquer Constantinople.
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Where to watch
Where to watch Conquest 1453Where to watch King Arthur
More like Conquest 1453 · More like King Arthur · Compare other titles