Conquest 1453 vs Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6/10 for Conquest 1453). Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World is the shorter watch at 2h 18m compared with 2h 40m. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World is the older of the two (2003 against 2012). Both are adventure, drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Conquest 1453
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World| Conquest 1453 | Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.2/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2003 |
| Length | 2h 40m | 2h 18m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, War | Adventure, Drama, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Faruk Aksoy | Peter Weir |
| Main cast | Devrim Evin, İbrahim Çelikkol, Dilek Serbest, Cengiz Coşkun, Recep Aktuğ | Paul Bettany, David Threlfall, Russell Crowe, George Innes, Billy Boyd |
Synopsis
Conquest 1453
After the death of his father Murat II, Mehmet II ascends to the Ottoman throne. After braving internal and external enemies, he decides to complete what he was destined to do: Conquer Constantinople.
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
After an abrupt and violent encounter with a French warship inflicts severe damage upon his ship, a captain of the British Royal Navy begins a chase over two oceans to capture or destroy the enemy, though he must weigh his commitment to duty and ferocious pursuit of glory against the safety of his devoted crew, including the ship's thoughtful surgeon, his best friend.
Where to watch
Where to watch Conquest 1453Where to watch Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
More like Conquest 1453 · More like Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World · Compare other titles