Cry in the Woods vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 5.6/10 for Cry in the Woods). Cry in the Woods is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2004). Both are crime, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Cry in the Woods
The Silence of the Lambs| Cry in the Woods | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.6/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Crime, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Erich Hörtnagl | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Stig Henrik Hoff, Pål Sverre Hagen, Aksel Hennie, Kristoffer Joner, Fridtjov Såheim | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Cry in the Woods
An unfortunate bank robber takes an escaped mental patient, wanted for murder, as hostage.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Cry in the WoodsWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Cry in the Woods · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles