Cure vs I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House
Cure has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 4.6/10 for I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House). I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is the shorter watch at 1h 29m compared with 1h 52m. Cure is the older of the two (1997 against 2016). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Cure
I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House| Cure | I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 4.6/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2016 |
| Length | 1h 52m | 1h 29m |
| Genres | Crime, Horror, Mystery, Thriller | Horror, Mystery |
| Country | Japan | – |
| Director | Kiyoshi Kurosawa | Osgood Perkins |
| Main cast | Ren Osugi, Denden, Yoriko Doguchi, Koji Yakusho, Masato Hagiwara | Ruth Wilson, Bob Balaban, Lucy Boynton, Beatrix Perkins, Paula Prentiss |
Synopsis
Cure
A detective starts spiraling out of control when a wave of gruesome murders with seemingly similar bizarre circumstances is sweeping Tokyo.
I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House
A young nurse takes care of an elderly author who lives in a haunted house.
Where to watch
Where to watch CureWhere to watch I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House
More like Cure · More like I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House · Compare other titles