Cure vs No Tears in Hell
Cure has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 5.2/10 for No Tears in Hell). No Tears in Hell is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 1h 52m. Cure is the older of the two (1997 against 2025). Both are crime, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Cure
No Tears in Hell| Cure | No Tears in Hell | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 5.2/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2025 |
| Length | 1h 52m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Crime, Horror, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Horror |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Kiyoshi Kurosawa | Michael Caissie |
| Main cast | Ren Osugi, Denden, Yoriko Doguchi, Koji Yakusho, Masato Hagiwara | Luke Baines, Princess Elmore, Tatjana Marjanovic, Gwen Van Dam, Audrey Neal |
Synopsis
Cure
A detective starts spiraling out of control when a wave of gruesome murders with seemingly similar bizarre circumstances is sweeping Tokyo.
No Tears in Hell
In the frozen darkness of an Alaskan winter, a mother and son turn their home into a house of nightmares — luring victims into a twisted web of abuse and cannibalism. Based on the terrifying true story of Russian serial killer Alexander Spesivtsev.
Where to watch
Where to watch CureWhere to watch No Tears in Hell
More like Cure · More like No Tears in Hell · Compare other titles