Cut Bank vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.7/10 for Cut Bank). Cut Bank is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2014). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Cut Bank | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.7/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Matt Shakman | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Billy Bob Thornton, Bruce Dern, Teresa Palmer, Liam Hemsworth, Michael Stuhlbarg | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
Cut Bank
25-year-old Dwayne McLaren, a former athlete turned auto mechanic, dreams of getting out of tiny Cut Bank, Montana the coldest town in America. But his effort to do so sets in motion a deadly series of events that change his life and the life of the town forever...
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch Cut BankWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like Cut Bank · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles
Cut Bank
In the Line of Fire