Dancer in the Dark vs Pulp Fiction
Pulp Fiction has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 7.9/10 for Dancer in the Dark). Dancer in the Dark is the shorter watch at 2h 20m compared with 2h 34m. Pulp Fiction is the older of the two (1994 against 2000). Both are crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Dancer in the Dark
Pulp Fiction| Dancer in the Dark | Pulp Fiction | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 1994 |
| Length | 2h 20m | 2h 34m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | Denmark | United States of America |
| Director | Lars von Trier | Quentin Tarantino |
| Main cast | Peter Stormare, Željko Ivanek, David Morse, Jean-Marc Barr, Cara Seymour | Samuel L. Jackson, Amanda Plummer, Christopher Walken, Ving Rhames, Uma Thurman |
Synopsis
Dancer in the Dark
Selma, a Czech immigrant on the verge of blindness, struggles to make ends meet for herself and her son, who has inherited the same genetic disorder and will suffer the same fate without an expensive operation. When life gets too difficult, Selma learns to cope through her love of musicals, dreaming up little numbers to the rhythmic beats of her surroundings.
Pulp Fiction
A burger-loving hit man, his philosophical partner, a drug-addled gangster's moll and a washed-up boxer converge in this sprawling, comedic crime caper. Their adventures unfurl in three stories that ingeniously trip back and forth in time.
Where to watch
Where to watch Dancer in the DarkWhere to watch Pulp Fiction
More like Dancer in the Dark · More like Pulp Fiction · Compare other titles