Dead Man's Shoes vs L.A. Confidential
L.A. Confidential has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.1/10 for Dead Man's Shoes). Dead Man's Shoes is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 2h 18m. L.A. Confidential is the older of the two (1997 against 2004). Both are crime, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Dead Man's Shoes | L.A. Confidential | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.1/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 1997 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 2h 18m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Shane Meadows | Curtis Hanson |
| Main cast | Toby Kebbell, Paddy Considine, Gary Stretch, Stuart Wolfenden, Neil Bell | Ron Rifkin, Guy Pearce, Simon Baker, Danny DeVito, Russell Crowe |
Synopsis
Dead Man's Shoes
A soldier returns to his small town and exacts a deadly revenge on the thugs who tormented his disabled brother while he was away.
L.A. Confidential
Three detectives in the corrupt and brutal L.A. police force of the 1950s use differing methods to uncover a conspiracy behind the shotgun slayings of the patrons at an all-night diner.
Where to watch
Where to watch Dead Man's ShoesWhere to watch L.A. Confidential
More like Dead Man's Shoes · More like L.A. Confidential · Compare other titles
Dead Man's Shoes
L.A. Confidential