Deadly Impact vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 4.8/10 for Deadly Impact). Deadly Impact is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Deadly Impact
Man on Fire| Deadly Impact | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 36m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Kurtzman | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Joe Pantoliano, Luce Rains, Kevin Wiggins, Fredrick Lopez, Sean Patrick Flanery | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Deadly Impact
Deadly Impact follows hard-nosed cop Thomas Armstrong (Flanery) whose life was shattered when he became the helpless target of a mastermind murderer. Returning home after a much-needed break, Armstrong joins the FBI to seek revenge and help track down the same killer that threatened his existence, however this time the assassin is back to terrorize not just a single person, but the entire city.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Deadly ImpactWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Deadly Impact · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles