Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib vs Lost in La Mancha
Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib has the higher audience score (10/10 against 7.1/10 for Lost in La Mancha). Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 1h 33m. Lost in La Mancha is the older of the two (2002 against 2016). Both are documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib
Lost in La Mancha| Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib | Lost in La Mancha | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2002 |
| Length | 46m | 1h 33m |
| Genres | Documentary, TV Movie | Documentary |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Lianne Steenkamp, Will Steenkamp | Keith Fulton, Louis Pepe |
| Main cast | – | Jeff Bridges, Johnny Depp, Jean Rochefort, Vanessa Paradis, Terry Gilliam |
Synopsis
Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib
Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib follows a lioness and her daughters as the travel through Namibia's desert with their five male cubs. The cubs are raised without a pride male and are instructed by their mothers in hunting both large prey and small. When the elderly matriarch dies, her daughters must finish the job.
Lost in La Mancha
Fulton and Pepe's 2000 documentary captures Terry Gilliam's attempt to get The Man Who Killed Don Quixote off the ground. Back injuries, freakish storms, and more zoom in to sabotage the project.
Where to watch
Where to watch Desert Warriors: Lions of the NamibWhere to watch Lost in La Mancha
More like Desert Warriors: Lions of the Namib · More like Lost in La Mancha · Compare other titles