Dinner with Friends vs Ken Park
Dinner with Friends has the higher audience score (10/10 against 6/10 for Ken Park). Dinner with Friends is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 37m. Ken Park is the older of the two (2003 against 2025). Both are drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Dinner with Friends | Ken Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 36m | 1h 37m |
| Genres | Drama | Drama |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Sasha Leigh Henry | Edward Lachman, Larry Clark |
| Main cast | Tattiawna Jones, Tymika Tafari, Alex Spencer, Izaak Smith, Andrew Bushell | Amanda Plummer, Harrison Young, James Ransone, Richard Riehle, Bill Fagerbakke |
Synopsis
Dinner with Friends
After the parties, jobs, and hook-ups throughout their twenties and into their thirties, eight friends are trying to hold on to their group as they get older and life gets complicated. Over a series of dinners, the group deals with loyalty, loss, and an uncertain future as relationships shift and secrets are unraveled, with each dinner bringing its own dynamic-shifting announcement of reconciliation, unexpected relationships, and betrayal. The…
Ken Park
Ken Park focuses on several teenagers and their tormented home lives. Shawn seems to be the most conventional. Tate is brimming with psychotic rage; Claude is habitually harassed by his brutish father and coddled, rather uncomfortably, by his enormously pregnant mother. Peaches looks after her devoutly religious father, but yearns for freedom. They're all rather tight, or so they claim.
Where to watch
Where to watch Dinner with FriendsWhere to watch Ken Park
More like Dinner with Friends · More like Ken Park · Compare other titles
Dinner with Friends
Ken Park