Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Firestarter
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.5/10 for Firestarter). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 34m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2022). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Firestarter| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Firestarter | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 5.5/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2022 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 34m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Keith Thomas |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Ryan Kiera Armstrong, Sydney Lemmon, John Beasley, Zac Efron, Jeremy Ferdman |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Firestarter
For more than a decade, parents Andy and Vicky have been on the run, desperate to hide their daughter Charlie from a shadowy federal agency that wants to harness her unprecedented gift for creating fire into a weapon of mass destruction. Andy has taught Charlie how to defuse her power, which is triggered by anger or pain. But as Charlie turns 11, the fire becomes harder and harder to control. After an incident reveals the family's location, a…
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Firestarter
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Firestarter · Compare other titles