Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Pulse

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.1/10 for Pulse). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 28m. Pulse is the older of the two (2006 against 2009). Both are drama, horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars posterDoctor Who: The Waters of Mars2009 VS Pulse posterPulse2006
Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsPulse
Audience score★ 7.9/10★ 5.1/10
Year20092006
Length1h 2m1h 28m
GenresAdventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV MovieDrama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction
CountryUnited Kingdom–
DirectorGraeme HarperJim Sonzero
Main castLindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-BrewsterRon Rifkin, Jonathan Tucker, Rick Gonzalez, Ian Somerhalder, Christina Milian

Synopsis

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars

In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.

Pulse

When the dead discover a means to contact the living through electronic devices, cellphones and computers become open gateways to monstrosities and destruction.

Where to watch

Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Pulse

More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Pulse · Compare other titles