Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Pulse
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.1/10 for Pulse). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 28m. Pulse is the older of the two (2006 against 2009). Both are drama, horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 5.1/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2006 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 28m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Jim Sonzero |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Ron Rifkin, Jonathan Tucker, Rick Gonzalez, Ian Somerhalder, Christina Milian |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Pulse
When the dead discover a means to contact the living through electronic devices, cellphones and computers become open gateways to monstrosities and destruction.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Pulse
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Pulse · Compare other titles
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Pulse