Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Rabid
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.8/10 for Rabid). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 47m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2019). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Rabid| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Rabid | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 5.8/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2019 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 47m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Jen Soska, Sylvia Soska |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Benjamin Hollingsworth, Kevin Hanchard, Laura Vandervoort, Ted Atherton, Stephen McHattie |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Rabid
The quiet Rose works in women's fashion clothing, hoping to be a designer. A traffic accident damages her face. She gets experimental stem cell treatment, leaving her stronger and prettier than ever - but there's a side effect.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Rabid
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Rabid · Compare other titles