Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Raw
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7/10 for Raw). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 39m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2016). Both are drama, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Raw| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Raw | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2016 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 39m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Drama, Horror |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Julia Ducournau |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Ella Rumpf, Bouli Lanners, Laurent Lucas, Garance Marillier, Rabah Nait Oufella |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Raw
In Justine’s family everyone is a vet and a vegetarian. At 16, she’s a gifted teen ready to take on her first year in vet school, where her older sister also studies. There, she gets no time to settle: hazing starts right away. Justine is forced to eat raw meat for the first time in her life. Unexpected consequences emerge as her true self begins to form.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Raw
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Raw · Compare other titles