Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Spring

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.6/10 for Spring). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 49m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2014). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars posterDoctor Who: The Waters of Mars2009 VS Spring posterSpring2014
Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsSpring
Audience score★ 7.9/10★ 6.6/10
Year20092014
Length1h 2m1h 49m
GenresAdventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV MovieHorror, Romance, Science Fiction
CountryUnited Kingdom–
DirectorGraeme HarperAaron Moorhead, Justin Benson
Main castLindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-BrewsterNadia Hilker, Lou Taylor Pucci, Shane Brady, Jeremy Gardner, Francesco Carnelutti

Synopsis

Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars

In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.

Spring

A young man in a personal tailspin flees the US to Italy, where he sparks up a romance with a woman harboring a dark, primordial secret.

Where to watch

Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Spring

More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Spring · Compare other titles