Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs The Battery
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.1/10 for The Battery). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 41m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2012). Both are drama, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
The Battery| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | The Battery | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Drama, Horror |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Jeremy Gardner |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Larry Fessenden, Jeremy Gardner, Adam Cronheim, Niels Bolle, Alana O'Brien |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
The Battery
In rural Connecticut, baseball players Ben and Mickey are trying to survive a zombie plague. They are forced to form a battery: a catcher and a pitcher who work together to outwit the batter, the one who hits the ball. And the batter in this case just happens to be a zombie. Tough Ben and gentle Mickey frequently disagree on the best way to go about the situation. Then they suddenly hear a human voice through their walkie-talkies. Is salvation…
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch The Battery
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like The Battery · Compare other titles