Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs The Devil's Advocate
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.5/10 for The Devil's Advocate). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 2h 24m. The Devil's Advocate is the older of the two (1997 against 2009). Both are drama, horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
The Devil's Advocate| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | The Devil's Advocate | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 1997 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 2h 24m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | United Kingdom | Germany |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Taylor Hackford |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Chris Bauer, Tamara Tunie, Charlize Theron, Connie Nielsen, Keanu Reeves |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
The Devil's Advocate
Aspiring Florida defense lawyer Kevin Lomax accepts a job at a New York law firm. With the stakes getting higher every case, Kevin quickly learns that his boss has something far more evil planned.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch The Devil's Advocate
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like The Devil's Advocate · Compare other titles