Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Ticks
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.7/10 for Ticks). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 25m. Ticks is the older of the two (1993 against 2009). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Ticks| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Ticks | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 5.7/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 25m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Tony Randel |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Seth Green, Clint Howard, Rance Howard, Ray Oriel, Rosalind Allen |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Ticks
Teens camping in a northern California retreat are terrorized by mutant insects created by evil, polluting pot farmers.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Ticks
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Ticks · Compare other titles