Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Urban Legends: Final Cut
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 4.9/10 for Urban Legends: Final Cut). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 38m. Urban Legends: Final Cut is the older of the two (2000 against 2009). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Urban Legends: Final Cut| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Urban Legends: Final Cut | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 38m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Horror, Mystery |
| Country | United Kingdom | United States of America |
| Director | Graeme Harper | John Ottman |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Anthony Anderson, Matthew Davis, Anson Mount, Jennifer Morrison, Hart Bochner |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Urban Legends: Final Cut
The making of a horror movie takes on a terrifying reality for students at the most prestigious film school in the country. At Alpine University, someone is determined to win the best film award at any cost - even if it means eliminating the competition. No one is safe and everyone is a suspect.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Urban Legends: Final Cut
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Urban Legends: Final Cut · Compare other titles