Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars vs Viral
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.6/10 for Viral). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 26m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2016). Both are drama, horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Viral| Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | Viral | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 5.6/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2016 |
| Length | 1h 2m | 1h 26m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie | Drama, Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Graeme Harper | Ariel Schulman, Henry Joost |
| Main cast | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster | Michael Kelly, Lio Tipton, Brianne Howey, mgk, Travis Tope |
Synopsis
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Viral
Following the outbreak of a virus that wipes out the majority of the human population, a young woman documents her family's new life in quarantine and tries to protect her infected sister.
Where to watch
Where to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of MarsWhere to watch Viral
More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · More like Viral · Compare other titles