Dolores Claiborne vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Dolores Claiborne has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 12m. Dolores Claiborne is the older of the two (1995 against 2005). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Dolores Claiborne
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough| Dolores Claiborne | Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.3/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 1995 | 2005 |
| Length | 2h 12m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery | Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Taylor Hackford | Jay Lowi |
| Main cast | Jennifer Jason Leigh, Eric Bogosian, Judy Parfitt, Kathy Bates, Christopher Plummer | Linden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer |
Synopsis
Dolores Claiborne
Dolores Claiborne was accused of killing her abusive husband twenty years ago, but the court's findings were inconclusive and she was allowed to walk free. Now she has been accused of killing her employer, Vera Donovan, and this time there is a witness who can place her at the scene of the crime. Things look bad for Dolores when her daughter Selena, a successful Manhattan magazine writer, returns to cover the story.
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Where to watch
Where to watch Dolores ClaiborneWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
More like Dolores Claiborne · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles