Early Man vs Princes and Princesses
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.1/10 for Early Man). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 29m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2018). Both are adventure, animation, comedy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Early Man
Princes and Princesses| Early Man | Princes and Princesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2018 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 29m | 1h 10m |
| Genres | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Family | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Nick Park | Michel Ocelot |
| Main cast | Tom Hiddleston, Eddie Redmayne, Kayvan Novak, Maisie Williams, Mark Williams | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin |
Synopsis
Early Man
Dug, along with his sidekick Hognob, unite a cavemen tribe to save their hidden valley from being spoiled and, all together as a team, to face the menace of a mysterious and mighty enemy, on the turf of an ancient and sacred sport.
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where to watch
Where to watch Early ManWhere to watch Princes and Princesses
More like Early Man · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles