Enola Holmes 3 vs Lucky Jo
Enola Holmes 3 has the higher audience score (10/10 against 6.7/10 for Lucky Jo). Lucky Jo is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 45m. Lucky Jo is the older of the two (1964 against 2026). Both are crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Enola Holmes 3
Lucky Jo| Enola Holmes 3 | Lucky Jo | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2026 | 1964 |
| Length | 1h 45m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Adventure, Crime, Mystery | Crime |
| Country | United States of America | France |
| Director | Philip Barantini | Michel Deville |
| Main cast | Henry Cavill, Millie Bobby Brown, Himesh Patel, Louis Partridge, Helena Bonham Carter | Eddie Constantine, Pierre Brasseur, Jean-Pierre Darras, Françoise Arnoul, Jean-Pierre Rambal |
Synopsis
Enola Holmes 3
Adventure follows detective Enola Holmes to Malta, where her plans to tie the knot unravel when Sherlock's disappearance plunges her into a perilous case.
Lucky Jo
Lucky Jo and his three friends are little criminals, who try to live from small burglaries. But they never have luck - ever so often something inpredictable happens to Jo and gets one of them arrested. While Jo is in prison once again, they decide they'd better do without him in future. He decides to help them secretly...and unfortunately.
Where to watch
Where to watch Enola Holmes 3Where to watch Lucky Jo
More like Enola Holmes 3 · More like Lucky Jo · Compare other titles