Estômago: A Gastronomic Story vs Fatal Instinct

Estômago: A Gastronomic Story has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.4/10 for Fatal Instinct). Fatal Instinct is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 53m. Fatal Instinct is the older of the two (1993 against 2007). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Estômago: A Gastronomic Story posterEstômago: A Gastronomic Story2007 VS Fatal Instinct posterFatal Instinct1993
Estômago: A Gastronomic StoryFatal Instinct
Audience score★ 7.9/10★ 5.4/10
Year20071993
Length1h 53m1h 31m
GenresComedy, Crime, Drama, MysteryComedy, Crime
Country––
DirectorMarcos JorgeCarl Reiner
Main castFabiula Nascimento, João Miguel, Babu Santana, Carlo Briani, Zeca CenoviczJames Remar, Kevin Michael Richardson, Eartha Kitt, Christopher McDonald, Armand Assante

Synopsis

Estômago: A Gastronomic Story

In a dog-eat-dog world, Raimundo Nonato has found an alternative way to move ahead: he cooks. No matter what social strata this deceptively innocent young man inhabits, he hones his skills and sharpens his knives—and then he falls in love. Jorge's nimble comic fable provides a smartly constructed gastronomic allegory for ambition and survival.

Fatal Instinct

Ned Ravine is a police officer and lawyer who occasionally defends the delinquents he arrests. He crosses paths with seductive Lola Cain during an assignment and promptly begins an affair with her. Meanwhile, Ned's wife, Lana, is deep in an affair of her own. Lana and her lover are planning to murder Ned in an elaborate fashion so they can collect on his triple indemnity life insurance policy.

Where to watch

Where to watch Estômago: A Gastronomic StoryWhere to watch Fatal Instinct

More like Estômago: A Gastronomic Story · More like Fatal Instinct · Compare other titles