Estômago: A Gastronomic Story vs To Die For
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 1h 53m. To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2007). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
To Die For| Estômago: A Gastronomic Story | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Mystery | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Marcos Jorge | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Fabiula Nascimento, João Miguel, Babu Santana, Carlo Briani, Zeca Cenovicz | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
In a dog-eat-dog world, Raimundo Nonato has found an alternative way to move ahead: he cooks. No matter what social strata this deceptively innocent young man inhabits, he hones his skills and sharpens his knives—and then he falls in love. Jorge's nimble comic fable provides a smartly constructed gastronomic allegory for ambition and survival.
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch Estômago: A Gastronomic StoryWhere to watch To Die For
More like Estômago: A Gastronomic Story · More like To Die For · Compare other titles