Estômago: A Gastronomic Story vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 1h 53m. Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the older of the two (2005 against 2007). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough| Estômago: A Gastronomic Story | Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2005 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Mystery | Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Marcos Jorge | Jay Lowi |
| Main cast | Fabiula Nascimento, João Miguel, Babu Santana, Carlo Briani, Zeca Cenovicz | Linden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer |
Synopsis
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
In a dog-eat-dog world, Raimundo Nonato has found an alternative way to move ahead: he cooks. No matter what social strata this deceptively innocent young man inhabits, he hones his skills and sharpens his knives—and then he falls in love. Jorge's nimble comic fable provides a smartly constructed gastronomic allegory for ambition and survival.
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Where to watch
Where to watch Estômago: A Gastronomic StoryWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
More like Estômago: A Gastronomic Story · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles