Experimenter vs Flood
Flood has the higher audience score (9/10 against 6.5/10 for Experimenter). Experimenter is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 1h 42m. Experimenter is the older of the two (2015 against 2025). Both are drama, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Experimenter
Flood| Experimenter | Flood | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 9.0/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 42m |
| Genres | Drama, History | Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Michael Almereyda | Martin Gonda |
| Main cast | Peter Sarsgaard, Taryn Manning, Winona Ryder, Edoardo Ballerini, Dennis Haysbert | Sara Chripáková, Jozef Pantlikáš, Katarína Babejová, Vladimíra Štefániková, Michal Soltész |
Synopsis
Experimenter
Yale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram designs a psychology experiment that still resonates to this day, in which people think they’re delivering painful electric shocks to an affable stranger strapped into a chair in another room. Despite his pleads for mercy, the majority of subjects don’t stop the experiment, administering what they think is a near-fatal electric shock, simply because they’ve been told to do so. With Nazi Adolf Eichmann’s…
Flood
In communist Czechoslovakia in 1980, Mara dreams of leaving her village to study in the city and become a pilot. But her father, a widowed Ruthenian farmer, insists she stay and work the land. When her village faces destruction due to a new dam, their generational conflict intensifies, revealing the struggle between tradition, identity, and the desire for freedom in a context of historical change.
Where to watch
Where to watch ExperimenterWhere to watch Flood
More like Experimenter · More like Flood · Compare other titles