Exposed vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 4.9/10 for Exposed). Exposed is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2016). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Exposed
In the Line of Fire| Exposed | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.9/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Gee Malik Linton | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Ismael Cruz Cordova, Mira Sorvino, Christopher McDonald, Keanu Reeves, Michael Rispoli | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
Exposed
After witnessing a miracle, a young Latina woman experiences strange things as a police detective searches for the truth behind his partner's death.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch ExposedWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like Exposed · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles