Eye for an Eye vs Inglourious Basterds
Inglourious Basterds has the higher audience score (8.2/10 against 6.2/10 for Eye for an Eye). Eye for an Eye is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 2h 33m. Eye for an Eye is the older of the two (1996 against 2009). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Eye for an Eye
Inglourious Basterds| Eye for an Eye | Inglourious Basterds | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 8.2/10 |
| Year | 1996 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 41m | 2h 33m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Drama, Thriller, War |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | John Schlesinger | Quentin Tarantino |
| Main cast | Kiefer Sutherland, Ed Harris, Keith David, Joe Mantegna, Philip Baker Hall | Michael Fassbender, Brad Pitt, Diane Kruger, Denis Ménochet, Christoph Waltz |
Synopsis
Eye for an Eye
It's fire and brimstone time as grieving mother Karen McCann takes justice into her own hands when a kangaroo court in Los Angeles fails to convict Robert Doob, the monster who raped and murdered her 17-year-old daughter.
Inglourious Basterds
In Nazi-occupied France during World War II, a group of Jewish-American soldiers known as "The Basterds" are chosen specifically to spread fear throughout the Third Reich by scalping and brutally killing Nazis. The Basterds, lead by Lt. Aldo Raine soon cross paths with a French-Jewish teenage girl who runs a movie theater in Paris which is targeted by the soldiers.
Where to watch
Where to watch Eye for an EyeWhere to watch Inglourious Basterds
More like Eye for an Eye · More like Inglourious Basterds · Compare other titles