Falling for Christmas vs Love Don't Co$t a Thing

Love Don't Co$t a Thing has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.2/10 for Falling for Christmas). Falling for Christmas is the shorter watch at 1h 35m compared with 1h 40m. Love Don't Co$t a Thing is the older of the two (2003 against 2022). Both are comedy, family, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Falling for Christmas posterFalling for Christmas2022 VS Love Don't Co$t a Thing posterLove Don't Co$t a Thing2003
Falling for ChristmasLove Don't Co$t a Thing
Audience score★ 6.2/10★ 7.5/10
Year20222003
Length1h 35m1h 40m
GenresComedy, Family, RomanceComedy, Drama, Family, Romance
Country–United States of America
DirectorJaneen DamianTroy Byer
Main castChord Overstreet, Jack Wagner, Lindsay Lohan, Bus Riley, George YoungDante Basco, Christina Milian, Kenan Thompson, Nick Cannon, Steve Harvey

Synopsis

Falling for Christmas

An engaged, spoiled hotel heiress finds herself in the care of a handsome, blue-collar lodge owner and his precocious daughter after getting amnesia in a skiing accident.

Love Don't Co$t a Thing

A high school outcast pays a cheerleader to pose as his girlfriend so he can be considered cool.

Where to watch

Where to watch Falling for ChristmasWhere to watch Love Don't Co$t a Thing

More like Falling for Christmas · More like Love Don't Co$t a Thing · Compare other titles