Fanaa vs Nowhere to Run

Fanaa has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6.4/10 for Nowhere to Run). Nowhere to Run is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 48m. Nowhere to Run is the older of the two (1993 against 2006). Both are action, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Fanaa posterFanaa2006 VS Nowhere to Run posterNowhere to Run1993
FanaaNowhere to Run
Audience score★ 6.8/10★ 6.4/10
Year20061993
Length2h 48m1h 34m
GenresAction, Drama, Romance, ThrillerAction, Drama, Romance, Thriller
Country––
DirectorKunal KohliRobert Harmon
Main castGautami Kapoor, Satish Shah, Vrajesh Hirjee, Tabu, Jaspal BhattiKieran Culkin, Rosanna Arquette, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Ted Levine, Tiffany Taubman

Synopsis

Fanaa

Zooni Ali Beg is a blind Kashmiri girl who travels without her parents for the first time with a dance troupe to Delhi to perform in a ceremony for independence day. On her journey, she meets Rehan Khan, a casanova and tour guide who flirts with her. Although her friends warn Zooni about him, she cannot resist falling in love with him and he takes her on a private tour of New Delhi. But there is more to Rehan than meets the eye and Zooni will…

Nowhere to Run

Escaped convict Sam Gillen single-handedly takes on ruthless developers who are determined to evict a widow with two young children.

Where to watch

Where to watch FanaaWhere to watch Nowhere to Run

More like Fanaa · More like Nowhere to Run · Compare other titles