Far and Away vs No Game, No Life: Zero
No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.8/10 for Far and Away). No Game, No Life: Zero is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 2h 20m. Far and Away is the older of the two (1992 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Far and Away
No Game, No Life: Zero| Far and Away | No Game, No Life: Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 1992 | 2017 |
| Length | 2h 20m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Romance, Western | Adventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Ron Howard | Atsuko Ishizuka |
| Main cast | Colm Meaney, Jared Harris, Nicole Kidman, Tom Cruise, Barbara Babcock | Yuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie Kugimiya |
Synopsis
Far and Away
A young couple escapes Ireland, dreaming of a new life during the land giveaway in Oklahoma. As they struggle to survive against betrayal and harsh winter conditions, they must fend off her parents who are determined to bring her back home.
No Game, No Life: Zero
Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…
Where to watch
Where to watch Far and AwayWhere to watch No Game, No Life: Zero
More like Far and Away · More like No Game, No Life: Zero · Compare other titles