Fatal Instinct vs London Calling
London Calling has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 5.4/10 for Fatal Instinct). Fatal Instinct is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 54m. Fatal Instinct is the older of the two (1993 against 2025). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Fatal Instinct
London Calling| Fatal Instinct | London Calling | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.4/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2025 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 1h 54m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Action, Comedy, Crime, Thriller |
| Country | – | South Africa |
| Director | Carl Reiner | Allan Ungar |
| Main cast | James Remar, Kevin Michael Richardson, Eartha Kitt, Christopher McDonald, Armand Assante | Rick Hoffman, Josh Duhamel, Aidan Gillen, Neil Sandilands, Brandon Auret |
Synopsis
Fatal Instinct
Ned Ravine is a police officer and lawyer who occasionally defends the delinquents he arrests. He crosses paths with seductive Lola Cain during an assignment and promptly begins an affair with her. Meanwhile, Ned's wife, Lana, is deep in an affair of her own. Lana and her lover are planning to murder Ned in an elaborate fashion so they can collect on his triple indemnity life insurance policy.
London Calling
After fleeing the UK from a job gone wrong, a down on his luck hitman is forced to babysit the son of his new crime boss and show him how to become a man.
Where to watch
Where to watch Fatal InstinctWhere to watch London Calling
More like Fatal Instinct · More like London Calling · Compare other titles