Fate of a Man vs Schindler's List

Schindler's List has the higher audience score (8.6/10 against 7.6/10 for Fate of a Man). Fate of a Man is the shorter watch at 1h 43m compared with 3h 15m. Fate of a Man is the older of the two (1959 against 1993). Both are drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Fate of a Man posterFate of a Man1959 VS Schindler's List posterSchindler's List1993
Fate of a ManSchindler's List
Audience score★ 7.6/10★ 8.6/10
Year19591993
Length1h 43m3h 15m
GenresDrama, WarDrama, History, War
Country–United States of America
DirectorSergey BondarchukSteven Spielberg
Main castAleksandr Kuznetsov, Sergey Bondarchuk, Pavel Boriskin, Zinaida Kirienko, Pavel VolkovCaroline Goodall, Mark Ivanir, Ralph Fiennes, Liam Neeson, Ben Kingsley

Synopsis

Fate of a Man

The story of a man whose life was ruthlessly crippled by World War II. His wife and daughters were killed during the bombing of his village, he spent some time as a prisoner, and his only son was killed in action only a few days before the victory...

Schindler's List

The true story of how businessman Oskar Schindler saved over a thousand Jewish lives from the Nazis while they worked as slaves in his factory during World War II.

Where to watch

Where to watch Fate of a ManWhere to watch Schindler's List

More like Fate of a Man · More like Schindler's List · Compare other titles