Firewall vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for Firewall). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 45m. Firewall is the older of the two (2006 against 2010). Both are action, crime, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Firewall
Undisputed III: Redemption| Firewall | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 45m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Richard Loncraine | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Mary Lynn Rajskub, Paul Bettany, Robert Patrick, Harrison Ford, Virginia Madsen | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Firewall
State-of-the-art security system creator Jack Stanfield has cemented his reputation as a man who's thought of everything. But when a criminal finds a way into his personal life, everything Jack holds dear is suddenly at stake.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch FirewallWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Firewall · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles