Food for Thought vs Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi
Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi has the higher audience score (10/10 against 9/10 for Food for Thought). Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi is the shorter watch at 35m compared with 1h 30m. Food for Thought is the older of the two (2025 against 2026). Both are documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Food for Thought
Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi| Food for Thought | Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 9.0/10 | ★ 10.0/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 35m |
| Genres | Documentary | Documentary |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Dan Richardson, Giles Alderson | Luke Hyams |
| Main cast | Harry Jarvis, Giles Alderson, Dan Richardson, Philip Lymbery, Mate Rimac | Joe Locke, Kit Connor, William Gao, Yasmin Finney, Corinna Brown |
Synopsis
Food for Thought
A touching, thought-provoking, at times hilarious look at the vegan movement.
Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi
After the ending of the hit Netflix series “Heartstopper”, this special combines never-before-seen behind-the-scenes footage, cast and crew interviews, larger cultural commentary, and fan input.
Where to watch
Where to watch Food for ThoughtWhere to watch Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi
More like Food for Thought · More like Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi · Compare other titles