Forever Young vs No Game, No Life: Zero
No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.5/10 for Forever Young). Forever Young is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 1h 46m. Forever Young is the older of the two (1992 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Forever Young
No Game, No Life: Zero| Forever Young | No Game, No Life: Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 1992 | 2017 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy, Romance, Science Fiction | Adventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Steve Miner | Atsuko Ishizuka |
| Main cast | Walton Goggins, Mel Gibson, Joe Morton, Jamie Lee Curtis, Elijah Wood | Yuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie Kugimiya |
Synopsis
Forever Young
A 1939 test pilot asks his best friend to use him as a guinea pig for a cryogenics experiment. Daniel McCormick wants to be frozen for a year so that he doesn't have to watch his love lying in a coma. The next thing Daniel knows is that he's been awoken in 1992.
No Game, No Life: Zero
Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…
Where to watch
Where to watch Forever YoungWhere to watch No Game, No Life: Zero
More like Forever Young · More like No Game, No Life: Zero · Compare other titles