Forever Young vs The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1
Forever Young has the higher audience score (6.5/10 against 6.2/10 for The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1). Forever Young is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 1h 57m. Forever Young is the older of the two (1992 against 2011). Both are adventure, fantasy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Forever Young | The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 1992 | 2011 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 1h 57m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy, Romance, Science Fiction | Adventure, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Steve Miner | Bill Condon |
| Main cast | Walton Goggins, Mel Gibson, Joe Morton, Jamie Lee Curtis, Elijah Wood | Billy Burke, Christian Camargo, Elizabeth Reaser, Michael Sheen, Peter Facinelli |
Synopsis
Forever Young
A 1939 test pilot asks his best friend to use him as a guinea pig for a cryogenics experiment. Daniel McCormick wants to be frozen for a year so that he doesn't have to watch his love lying in a coma. The next thing Daniel knows is that he's been awoken in 1992.
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1
Bella Swan and Edward Cullen's honeymoon phase is abruptly disrupted by betrayals and unforeseen tragedies that endanger their world.
Where to watch
Where to watch Forever YoungWhere to watch The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1
More like Forever Young · More like The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 · Compare other titles
Forever Young
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1