Forrest Gump vs Trace of Stones
Forrest Gump has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). Trace of Stones is the shorter watch at 2h 19m compared with 2h 22m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 1994). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Forrest Gump
Trace of Stones| Forrest Gump | Trace of Stones | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.5/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 1994 | 1966 |
| Length | 2h 22m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Robert Zemeckis | Frank Beyer |
| Main cast | Gary Sinise, Robin Wright, Tom Hanks, Hanna Hall, Siobhan Fallon Hogan | Hans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke |
Synopsis
Forrest Gump
A man with a low IQ has accomplished great things in his life and been present during significant historic events—in each case, far exceeding what anyone imagined he could do. But despite all he has achieved, his one true love eludes him.
Trace of Stones
Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…
Where to watch
Where to watch Forrest GumpWhere to watch Trace of Stones
More like Forrest Gump · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles