Forsaken vs Legends of the Fall
Legends of the Fall has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.1/10 for Forsaken). Forsaken is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 2h 13m. Legends of the Fall is the older of the two (1994 against 2015). Both are action, drama, western movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Forsaken
Legends of the Fall| Forsaken | Legends of the Fall | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 1994 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 2h 13m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Western | Action, Drama, Romance, War, Western |
| Country | Canada | United States of America |
| Director | Jon Cassar | Edward Zwick |
| Main cast | Kiefer Sutherland, Brian Cox, Donald Sutherland, Demi Moore, Michael Wincott | Julia Ormond, Anthony Hopkins, Henry Thomas, Aidan Quinn, Brad Pitt |
Synopsis
Forsaken
John Henry returns to his hometown in hopes of repairing his relationship with his estranged father, but a local gang is terrorizing the town. John Henry is the only one who can stop them, however he has abandoned both his gun and reputation as a fearless quick-draw killer.
Legends of the Fall
In early 20th-century Montana, Col. William Ludlow lives on a ranch in the wilderness with his sons, Alfred, Tristan, and Samuel. Eventually, the unconventional but close-knit family are bound by loyalty, tested by war, and torn apart by love, as told over the course of several decades in this epic saga.
Where to watch
Where to watch ForsakenWhere to watch Legends of the Fall
More like Forsaken · More like Legends of the Fall · Compare other titles