Four Lions vs The Wolf of Wall Street
The Wolf of Wall Street has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.9/10 for Four Lions). Four Lions is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 3h . Four Lions is the older of the two (2010 against 2013). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Four Lions | The Wolf of Wall Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 3h |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Chris Morris | Martin Scorsese |
| Main cast | Benedict Cumberbatch, Kayvan Novak, Adeel Akhtar, Alex Macqueen, Riz Ahmed | Jon Bernthal, Shea Whigham, Joanna Lumley, Cristin Milioti, Jon Favreau |
Synopsis
Four Lions
Four Lions tells the story of a group of British jihadists who push their abstract dreams of glory to the breaking point. As the wheels fly off, and their competing ideologies clash, what emerges is an emotionally engaging (and entirely plausible) farce.
The Wolf of Wall Street
A New York stockbroker refuses to cooperate in a large securities fraud case involving corruption on Wall Street, corporate banking world and mob infiltration. Based on Jordan Belfort's autobiography.
Where to watch
Where to watch Four LionsWhere to watch The Wolf of Wall Street
More like Four Lions · More like The Wolf of Wall Street · Compare other titles
Four Lions
The Wolf of Wall Street