Foxcatcher vs Pulp Fiction
Pulp Fiction has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 6.7/10 for Foxcatcher). Foxcatcher is the shorter watch at 2h 14m compared with 2h 34m. Pulp Fiction is the older of the two (1994 against 2014). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Foxcatcher | Pulp Fiction | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.7/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 1994 |
| Length | 2h 14m | 2h 34m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Bennett Miller | Quentin Tarantino |
| Main cast | Vanessa Redgrave, Anthony Michael Hall, Mark Ruffalo, Steve Carell, Channing Tatum | Samuel L. Jackson, Amanda Plummer, Christopher Walken, Ving Rhames, Uma Thurman |
Synopsis
Foxcatcher
The greatest Olympic Wrestling Champion brother team joins Team Foxcatcher led by multimillionaire sponsor John E. du Pont as they train for the 1988 games in Seoul - a union that leads to unlikely circumstances.
Pulp Fiction
A burger-loving hit man, his philosophical partner, a drug-addled gangster's moll and a washed-up boxer converge in this sprawling, comedic crime caper. Their adventures unfurl in three stories that ingeniously trip back and forth in time.
Where to watch
Where to watch FoxcatcherWhere to watch Pulp Fiction
More like Foxcatcher · More like Pulp Fiction · Compare other titles
Foxcatcher
Pulp Fiction