Frantic vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.7/10 for Frantic). Frantic is the shorter watch at 2h compared with 2h 8m. Frantic is the older of the two (1988 against 1993). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Frantic
In the Line of Fire| Frantic | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.7/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 1988 | 1993 |
| Length | 2h | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Roman Polanski | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Harrison Ford, John Mahoney, Dominique Pinon, Betty Buckley, Emmanuelle Seigner | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
Frantic
The wife of an American doctor suddenly vanishes in Paris. To find her, he navigates a puzzling web of language, locale, laissez-faire cops, triplicate-form filling bureaucrats and a defiant, mysterious waif who knows more than she tells.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch FranticWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like Frantic · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles