Fun with Dick and Jane vs The Wolf of Wall Street
The Wolf of Wall Street has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.2/10 for Fun with Dick and Jane). Fun with Dick and Jane is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 3h . Fun with Dick and Jane is the older of the two (2005 against 2013). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Fun with Dick and Jane
The Wolf of Wall Street| Fun with Dick and Jane | The Wolf of Wall Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2005 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 3h |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Dean Parisot | Martin Scorsese |
| Main cast | Richard Jenkins, Jim Carrey, Téa Leoni, David Herman, Alec Baldwin | Jon Bernthal, Shea Whigham, Joanna Lumley, Cristin Milioti, Jon Favreau |
Synopsis
Fun with Dick and Jane
After Dick Harper loses his job at Globodyne in an Enron-esque collapse, he and his wife, Jane, turn to crime in order to handle the massive debt they now face. Two intelligent people, Dick and Jane actually get pretty good at robbing people and even enjoy it -- but they have second thoughts when they're reminded that crime can hurt innocent people. When the couple hears that Globodyne boss Jack McCallister actually swindled the company, they…
The Wolf of Wall Street
A New York stockbroker refuses to cooperate in a large securities fraud case involving corruption on Wall Street, corporate banking world and mob infiltration. Based on Jordan Belfort's autobiography.
Where to watch
Where to watch Fun with Dick and JaneWhere to watch The Wolf of Wall Street
More like Fun with Dick and Jane · More like The Wolf of Wall Street · Compare other titles