Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs vs In a Heartbeat
In a Heartbeat has the higher audience score (8/10 against 7/10 for Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs). In a Heartbeat is the shorter watch at 4m compared with 1h 30m. Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs is the older of the two (2008 against 2017). Both are animation, comedy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs
In a Heartbeat| Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs | In a Heartbeat | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2008 | 2017 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 4m |
| Genres | Animation, Comedy, Romance, Science Fiction | Animation, Comedy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Peter Avanzino | Beth David, Esteban Bravo |
| Main cast | Katey Sagal, Phil LaMarr, John DiMaggio, Dan Castellaneta, Tress MacNeille | Nick Ainsworth, Kelly Donohue |
Synopsis
Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs
Fresh off ripping space-time a new one at the end of "Bender's Big Score," the Planet Express crew is back to mend the tear in reality, or (hopefully) at least not make it worse. Beyond the tear, though, lurks a being of inconceivable...tentacularity. What will become of Earth, and indeed, our universe, when faced with the Beast with a Billion Backs?
In a Heartbeat
A closeted boy runs the risk of being outed by his own heart after it pops out of his chest to chase down the boy of his dreams.
Where to watch
Where to watch Futurama: The Beast with a Billion BacksWhere to watch In a Heartbeat
More like Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs · More like In a Heartbeat · Compare other titles