George of the Jungle vs Princes and Princesses

Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 5.6/10 for George of the Jungle). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 32m. George of the Jungle is the older of the two (1997 against 2000). Both are adventure, comedy, family movies, so they suit a similar mood.

George of the Jungle posterGeorge of the Jungle1997 VS Princes and Princesses posterPrinces and Princesses2000
George of the JunglePrinces and Princesses
Audience score★ 5.6/10★ 7.7/10
Year19972000
Length1h 32m1h 10m
GenresAdventure, Comedy, Family, RomanceAdventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance
Country––
DirectorSam WeismanMichel Ocelot
Main castBrendan Fraser, Richard Roundtree, Keith Scott, Holland Taylor, Thomas Haden ChurchYves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin

Synopsis

George of the Jungle

Deep in the African jungle, a baby named George, the sole survivor of a plane crash, is raised by gorillas. George grows up to be a buff and lovable klutz who has a rainforest full of animal friends: Tookie, his big-beaked toucan messenger; Ape, a witty talking gorilla; and Shep, a peanut-loving pooch of an elephant. But when poachers mess with George's pals, the King of Swing swings into action.

Princes and Princesses

In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.

Where to watch

Where to watch George of the JungleWhere to watch Princes and Princesses

More like George of the Jungle · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles